Hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) software provides virtualized compute, storage, networking and associated (cloud) management — from a single instantiation running on server hardware. When the first HCI platforms emerged a decade ago, they were sold primarily as alternatives to expensive and complex storage arrays for VMware environments. These initial HCI solutions were sold primarily as appliances by a single hardware vendor — what Gartner defined as hyperconverged integrated systems (HCIS; see Market Definitions and Methodology: Integrated Systems).
As the market has evolved, there has been a distinct bifurcation, with HCIS being the direction driven by hardware providers, and HCI software being driven by the software providers. The latter is the focus of this analysis and is distinct from the former, because it supports and is sold on server hardware solutions from multiple server providers. This HCI software has become the mechanism for driving a wider array of solutions. Some of those solutions focus on market niches that may align with specific use cases or particular geographies. Other HCI software solutions are focused broadly on more cloud-related functionality.
All HCI software, by definition, includes a certain set of functionality. Some of that functionality may be enabled by hypervisors, management tools and networking, or through only a storage platform combined with third-party software providers to complete the HCI software stack. That functionality is:
-
Virtual compute, storage and networking, using a scale-out, shared-nothing architecture
-
Unified, “single pane of glass” management for virtual compute, storage and networking resources; for the purposes of this analysis, although network management is required, it can be enabled through integrated, third-party software by the HCI software provider
-
Local, direct-attached storage (DAS) in each node, used in place of a storage array
-
Enterprise-grade, high-availability (HA) and mobility, for both compute and storage
-
Enterprise-grade data services (e.g., deduplication, compression and erasure coding)
-
Some level of choice of server and network hardware
The rapid growth of public cloud has transformed infrastructure. Typical IT organizations have some infrastructure in the public cloud, some in data centers and some at the edge. This brings hybrid cloud architectures to the fore. Now, almost every data center is a hybrid data center. Connectivity to and portability between on-premises infrastructures and the public cloud has become a more important design consideration for data centers.
As it has promised since it first appeared in the market, HCI software can be an enabling architecture for the hybrid cloud. Like public cloud infrastructure, HCI software is software-defined and API-driven, meaning that it can be managed using the same tools and techniques used to manage the public cloud. From this management perspective, HCI software is driving the hybrid-cloud evolution that has become the underpinning of hyperconvergence as an architecture. Some HCI software vendors have even begun to provide cloud services in their own right.
Magic Quadrant
Figure 1: Magic Quadrant for Hyperconverged Infrastructure Software

Source: Gartner (December 2020)
Vendor Strengths and Cautions
Vendors Added and Dropped
We review and adjust our inclusion criteria for Magic Quadrants as markets change. As a result of these adjustments, the mix of vendors in any Magic Quadrant may change over time. A vendor’s appearance in a Magic Quadrant one year and not the next does not necessarily indicate that we have changed our opinion of that vendor. It may be a reflection of a change in the market and, therefore, changed evaluation criteria, or of a change of focus by that vendor.
Dropped
Cisco was dropped due to changes in the inclusion criteria, which exclude HCIS solutions (those will be covered in other Gartner publications).
Dell EMC was dropped due to changes in the inclusion criteria, which exclude HCIS solutions (those will be covered in other Gartner publications).
HPE was dropped due to changes in the inclusion criteria, which exclude HCIS solutions (those will be covered in other Gartner publications).
Huawei was dropped due to changes in the inclusion criteria, which exclude HCIS solutions (those will be covered in other Gartner publications).
Red Hat was dropped due to a narrowing of its focus to only three use cases.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The inclusion criteria represent the specific attributes that analysts believe are necessary for inclusion in this research. To qualify for inclusion, vendors need to meet the following criteria.
Functional Criteria
Included HCI software vendors must:
-
Provide an integrated software stack, which includes unified management, and software-defined compute, storage and, optionally, networking.
-
Combine virtual machine (VM) and software-defined storage resources, both running on the same physical servers, as the primary deployment method.
-
Virtualize local, internal and direct-attached storage, rather than shared, networked storage, such as a SAN and/or network-attached storage (NAS).
-
Provide a mechanism to pool internal and direct-attached primary storage across servers into logical, abstracted virtual storage.
-
Develop the storage and data management services integrated in the offering.
Business Criteria
Eligible HCI software vendors must:
-
Provide evidence for each product to be evaluated of a minimum of 50 production customers brought to revenue. At least 25 in each of at least two of the major geographies (the Americas, EMEA and the APAC/Japan region) in the 12 months ending 30 June 2020.
-
Deliver complete Level 1 (call center/service desk) and Level 2 (escalation) support either directly or through a contracted service provider to facilitate quick and easy problem resolution. However, Level 3 (engineering) support can be delivered separately, based on vendors’ engineering partnerships.
-
Deliver solutions that meet user requirements in at least four of the use cases identified in “Critical Capabilities for Hyperconverged Infrastructure.”
-
Have delivered the product or products to be evaluated in the Critical Capabilities research in general availability by 30 June 2020.
-
Provide HCI software that is portable to, sold within the past year to, and supported and qualified on branded x86 server hardware of at least two server providers beyond any white-box or server hardware branded and badged with the HCI software provider’s logo. At least one of those two server providers must be one of the top 10 x86-based server OEMs worldwide based on server vendor revenue estimates for 2020 published by Gartner. Those providers are Dell, HPE, Inspur Electronics, Lenovo, Cisco, Huawei, Super Micro Computer, H3C, Fujitsu and Oracle.
-
Own the software IP that enables the management functions and SDS for their solution.
Evaluation Criteria
Ability to Execute
Product/Service: Core goods and services offered by the vendor for the defined market. This includes current product/service capabilities, quality, feature sets, skills, etc., whether offered natively or through OEM agreements/partnerships, as defined in the market definition and detailed in the subcriteria.
Overall Viability: Viability includes an assessment of the overall organization’s financial health, and the financial and practical success of the business unit. It also involves the likelihood that the individual business unit will continue investing in the product, offering the product and advancing the state of the art in the organization’s portfolio of products.
Sales Execution/Pricing: The vendor’s capabilities in all presales activities and the structure that supports them. This includes deal management, pricing and negotiation, presales support, and the overall effectiveness of the sales channel.
Market Responsiveness/Record: The ability to respond, change direction, be flexible and achieve competitive success as opportunities develop, competitors act, customer needs evolve and market dynamics change. This criterion also considers the vendor’s history of responsiveness.
Marketing Execution: The clarity, quality, creativity and efficacy of programs designed to deliver the organization’s message to influence the market, and promote the brand and business. This also involves increasing awareness of the products, and establishing a positive identification with the product/brand and organization in the minds of buyers. This “mind share” can be driven by a combination of publicity, promotional initiatives, thought leadership, word of mouth and sales activities.
Customer Experience: Relationships, products and services/programs that enable clients to be successful with the products evaluated. Specifically, this includes the ways customers receive technical support or account support. This can also include ancillary tools, customer support programs (and the quality thereof), availability of user groups, service-level agreements (SLAs), etc.
Operations: The ability of the organization to meet its goals and commitments. Factors include the quality of the organizational structure, including skills, experiences, programs, systems and other vehicles that enable the organization to operate effectively and efficiently on an ongoing basis.
Table 1: Ability to Execute Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation Criteria |
Weighting |
Product or Service
|
High
|
Overall Viability
|
High
|
Sales Execution/Pricing
|
Medium
|
Market Responsiveness/Record
|
High
|
Marketing Execution
|
Medium
|
Customer Experience
|
High
|
Operations
|
Low
|
|
Source: Gartner (December 2020)
Completeness of Vision
Market Understanding: The ability of the vendor to understand buyers’ wants and needs and to translate those into products and services. Vendors that show the highest degree of vision listen to and understand buyers’ wants and needs, and can shape or enhance those with their added vision.
Marketing Strategy: A clear, differentiated set of messages consistently communicated throughout the organization and externalized through the website, advertising, customer programs and positioning statements.
Sales Strategy: The strategy for selling products that uses the appropriate network of direct and indirect sales, marketing, service, and communication affiliates that extend the scope and depth of market reach, skills, expertise, technologies, services and the customer base.
Offering (Product) Strategy: The vendor’s approach to product development and delivery that emphasizes differentiation, functionality, methodology and feature sets as they map to current and future requirements.
Business Model: The soundness and logic of the vendor’s underlying business proposition.
Vertical/Industry Strategy: The vendor’s strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the specific needs of individual market segments, including vertical markets.
Innovation: Direct, related, complementary and synergistic layouts of resources, expertise or capital for investment, consolidation, defensive or preemptive purposes.
Geographic Strategy: The vendor’s strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the specific needs of geographies outside the “home” or native geography, either directly or through partners, channels and subsidiaries as appropriate for that geography and market.
Table 2: Completeness of Vision Evaluation Criteria
|
Weighting |
Market Understanding
|
High
|
Marketing Strategy
|
Medium
|
Sales Strategy
|
Medium
|
Offering (Product) Strategy
|
High
|
Business Model
|
Medium
|
Vertical/Industry Strategy
|
Medium
|
Innovation
|
High
|
Geographic Strategy
|
Medium
|
|
Source: Gartner (December 2020)
Quadrant Descriptions
Leaders
Leaders will typically be able to execute strongly across multiple geographies, verticals, use cases and deployment models. They will have a support and channel organization that ensures a high-quality customer experience, regardless of whether the solution is purchased directly or through resellers, integration partners or OEMs.
Challengers
Challengers are typically vendors with achievements that, although significant, are based on a narrower subset of the market, having gaps in geographic coverage, product portfolios and use cases. These vendors have the potential to establish themselves across the broader, global market, but have not yet done so.
Visionaries
Visionaries are typically vendors that are focusing on strong innovation and product differentiation, with the potential to significantly disrupt the market if execution improves. These may be smaller vendors with limited reach or achievement to date, or larger vendors with innovation programs that are still unproven.
Niche Players
Niche Players are typically vendors with market programs focused on a limited set of geographic locations, deployment models, customer segments or use cases. These vendors have met the inclusion criteria and may address their specific market category effectively.
Context
HCI software is not limited to a system (hardware appliance) deployment model. Software-only/bring-your-own-server, reference architectures, cloud and as-a-service deployments are growing. Vendors with HCI software often rely on OEM partnerships and server certifications to provide greater choice and an improved support experience.
I&O leaders should estimate the component growth requirements to determine the need for asymmetrical scaling. The proof of concept (POC) should include a careful analysis of performance during node failures, the increase in risk during node failures and the time to recover from node failures.
As HCI software has evolved, the integrated support of orchestration tools such as Kubernetes has increased across many providers. The intent is to provide an interface that goes beyond HCI itself to facilitate the automated deployment of containerized applications. The actual use of these orchestration tools supported by HCI software appears to be in an early phase, but it has become a requirement for some customers that expect to leverage that container management capability in the near future.
The adoption of HCI-based solutions continues to grow; however, outside smaller organizations, HCI has not yet become a full-service platform for IT services across all workloads. I&O leaders should evaluate HCI software solutions because of the fit for their particular use cases, growth expectations and application architecture direction. Adopting technology innovation must be business-led, not technology-driven. There is no ideal integrated system or “endgame” infrastructure. New hardware and software innovations will continue to appear, moving the goalposts, and pushing the boundaries of infrastructure design and delivery.
Simplified management capabilities for infrastructure running whether it is in enterprise data centers, at a colocation facility, at the edge or in the public cloud isone of the broader goals that leading HCI software providers are looking to meet.
Market Overview
The HCI software market has two distinct customer types that align with current market conditions.
Some HCI software vendors continue to expand their deployment options to include more cloud providers, such as Amazon, Google and Microsoft, with the intent to be turnkey private/hybrid cloud. For those HCI software providers, this emphasizes a focus on tools and capabilities to monitor, secure, manage, optimize, and govern diverse on-premises, cloud and edge deployments. Other HCI software vendors look to provide specific use-case advantages or high-touch, regionally appealing solutions in an attempt to establish an effective niche approach in alignment with HCI software market trends.
Many partners in the HCI software market are also competitors, and I&O leaders must remain cognizant of the sometimes conflicting priorities and incentives of HCI software vendors and their partners, as well as rapidly expanding HCI software partner networks. Full-stack infrastructure software suppliers, such as Microsoft, Nutanix and VMware, pose interesting partnership challenges, because each has significant HCI software opportunities in its substantial installed base of customers.
Vendors that have more hypervisor-neutral — or at least hypervisor-flexible — offerings may have advantages for customers that want to avoid hypervisor lock-in. I&O leaders pursuing multihypervisor strategies should carefully evaluate the ability of solution providers to deliver simplicity at the management layer.
Potential HCI Market Disruption: Cloud providers Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Oracle could ultimately disrupt the entire HCI software market. They are further extending their cloud offerings to on-premises infrastructure with offerings such as Amazon Outposts, Google Anthos, Microsoft Azure Stack Hub and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. Meanwhile, I&O leaders will have an alternative to public cloud and private data centers by leveraging IaaS providers that use simpler-to-manage HCI software for their own infrastructures.
Evaluation Criteria Definitions
Ability to Execute
Product/Service: Core goods and services offered by the vendor for the defined market. This includes current product/service capabilities, quality, feature sets, skills and so on, whether offered natively or through OEM agreements/partnerships as defined in the market definition and detailed in the subcriteria.
Overall Viability: Viability includes an assessment of the overall organization’s financial health, the financial and practical success of the business unit, and the likelihood that the individual business unit will continue investing in the product, will continue offering the product and will advance the state of the art within the organization’s portfolio of products.
Sales Execution/Pricing: The vendor’s capabilities in all presales activities and the structure that supports them. This includes deal management, pricing and negotiation, presales support, and the overall effectiveness of the sales channel.
Market Responsiveness/Record: Ability to respond, change direction, be flexible and achieve competitive success as opportunities develop, competitors act, customer needs evolve and market dynamics change. This criterion also considers the vendor’s history of responsiveness.
Marketing Execution: The clarity, quality, creativity and efficacy of programs designed to deliver the organization’s message to influence the market, promote the brand and business, increase awareness of the products, and establish a positive identification with the product/brand and organization in the minds of buyers. This “mind share” can be driven by a combination of publicity, promotional initiatives, thought leadership, word of mouth and sales activities.
Customer Experience: Relationships, products and services/programs that enable clients to be successful with the products evaluated. Specifically, this includes the ways customers receive technical support or account support. This can also include ancillary tools, customer support programs (and the quality thereof), availability of user groups, service-level agreements and so on.
Operations: The ability of the organization to meet its goals and commitments. Factors include the quality of the organizational structure, including skills, experiences, programs, systems and other vehicles that enable the organization to operate effectively and efficiently on an ongoing basis.
Completeness of Vision
Market Understanding: Ability of the vendor to understand buyers’ wants and needs and to translate those into products and services. Vendors that show the highest degree of vision listen to and understand buyers’ wants and needs, and can shape or enhance those with their added vision.
Marketing Strategy: A clear, differentiated set of messages consistently communicated throughout the organization and externalized through the website, advertising, customer programs and positioning statements.
Sales Strategy: The strategy for selling products that uses the appropriate network of direct and indirect sales, marketing, service, and communication affiliates that extend the scope and depth of market reach, skills, expertise, technologies, services and the customer base.
Offering (Product) Strategy: The vendor’s approach to product development and delivery that emphasizes differentiation, functionality, methodology and feature sets as they map to current and future requirements.
Business Model: The soundness and logic of the vendor’s underlying business proposition.
Vertical/Industry Strategy: The vendor’s strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the specific needs of individual market segments, including vertical markets.
Innovation: Direct, related, complementary and synergistic layouts of resources, expertise or capital for investment, consolidation, defensive or pre-emptive purposes.
Geographic Strategy: The vendor’s strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the specific needs of geographies outside the “home” or native geography, either directly or through partners, channels and subsidiaries as appropriate for that geography and market.
fonte: https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1-24RF8KA4&ct=201208&st=sb